Scientific Dogma under review wins Editors Choice on Popular Articles

by Billy Cart Cave
08/05/2012

Scientific Dogma under review. By

James A. Foster. April 9th 2012 jijosu55@yahoo.com

Science can do many wonderful things, but there is one thing it cannot and will not do….and that is provide a platform for alternative opinion. What normally happens is that science forms an opinion that becomes "Consensus science" and any professional scientist that has the temerity to challenge this is basically ostracized and almost totally ignored.

Consensus Science virtually means that the scientific community maintains knowledge that is painfully wrong and should not be taught in our schools.

So how does one overcome this attitude to correct knowledge?

The Scientific community will not do anything to do away with this block on the opinions of educated but frightened scientists that fear the stigma of being labeled ‘fringe lunatic.’

It seems that the only way that this knowledge can be provided to the Public is by Authors and Journalists.

The information that these books seem to possess is totally ignored by the Establishment as though it doesn’t exist.

There doesn’t seem to be a scientist willing to categorically prove that the information in the so called pseudo science books are wrong.

Why is this? The obvious answer is that they can’t. They are compelled to deny the knowledge in the books but fail to prove they are right teaching the Consensus Science.

Perhaps an example is called for?

Let’s take for example the Egyptian Pyramids.

Why is it so important to the Establishment to keep the argument going that Egypt built the Pyramids?

Obviously if it was proved beyond doubt that Egypt did not build the Pyramids then of course they would be ruled out as one of the pillars of Civilization!

It is one of the fundamental reasons that Egyptologists maintain the Consensus Science. They cannot bear the thought of Egypt being nothing more than labour.

Why is this?

It would become known that Egypt was an inheritor of knowledge …not the discoverer of knowledge!

It would be obvious that egyptians were just the manual labour that worked for a superior race that built the pyramids for another purpose than so called ‘Tombs’

Looking at the later pyramids as they got poorer built clearly demonstrate that they never knew how the pyramids were built.

They didn’t have the skills then but tried to discover it for themselves.

The very fact that the Establishment cannot prove beyond a doubt that the hieroglyphics were started and developed by Egyptians is one of the consensus science glaring reasons for being.

The fact that the scientific information inherent in the Pyramids is proof really that Egypt did not build them. The Pictures in the later tombs that categorically show’s a society that uses stick ploughs would be totally incapable of building structures like the pyramids. In reality the structures that are all over Egypt and the world demonstrate that there was in Antiquity a scientific Society that existed possibly 12,000-10,000 years ago. It is not the purpose of this article to show who that society was merely to postulate it existed.

Below the Temple of Jupiter in modern day Lebanon is the Platform of a previous race. Rome did not build this platform and never said they did. It was clearly there from a previous age.

The platform itself clearly demonstrates that even today we could not cut and move a piece of material so large.

Estimated at 1000 tons the piece in question could not be moved even today by our so called scientific and engineering society.

All over the world there are ruins that cannot be explained. Cities are being rediscovered below the ocean roughly where the ocean has covered the land.

Cities that were above the waves and prosperous perhaps even before the ice in the Ice Age melted and raised our ocean levels.

The Gulf of Cambey in Southern India springs to mind. All over the world are ruins popularly called by the Establishment as ‘Temples’ for no more apparent reason than they cannot explain them as a scientific establishment anywhere from 4000 to 9000 years ago. Stonehenge instantly springs to mind.

This is taught as a Calendar or Druid Temple by the Scientists that toe the Consensus line.

Looking deeper the amount of scientific information encoded in this structure clearly demonstrates it is not merely a calendar but an astronomical observatory as well.

All over the world there are numerous societies that grew their food and never knew what a calendar was.

Stonehenge clearly was a scientific area.

The purpose of this article is to demonstrate in a small way the apparent rearguard action of our modern society.

It is a fact that religion itself would possibly be a victim if knowledge was openly taught correctly.

It is of course the pillars of our civilization Greece-Egypt-Rome that would have the most to lose if knowledge as taught today was openly admitted to be incorrect. So much of history was actually rediscovered or claimed by these societies.

It is apparent that all those societies rose and claimed knowledge from a previous age.

The first society that we clearly seek to push aside and never teach is the Sumerian Civilization.

What did the Sumerians teach us? Virtually every modern profession they invented.

The basic laws we abide by were mostly made by them and not by us.

All our laws seem to be based on Sumerian Laws.

Our Religions steal stories from them and claim them as recent history in our Holy Books. .

And yet the Establishment will not teach Sumerian History in our schools.

Why?

Is it because if we look to deeply we will see that our so called Pillars of Present Day Civilization is nothing more than rediscovering what was always there at least 5000 years ago?

What perhaps is the secret of this rearguard action?

Is there some devastating secret of our development that our religions and governments feel we cannot accept?

Could we be so profoundly insulted if we found something in our past that would damage us psychologically as a race?

The problem with this must be that only by confronting our past can we face the future as a mature race.

Consensus Science holds back our society and the scientists and learned men must be freed from this modern day curse.

I wonder how many scientists who read this can point to facts that are accepted as ‘modern’ but those same facts are known to exist far back in time.

Isn’t it time for scientists and teachers to face up to the facts as we know them and refuse to hide behind Consensus Science?

More Information:

James A. Foster is an unpublished Author of two books {presently} that lives in Sydney Australia.

various articles.

The Godpower... by James A. Foster.

The HYBRID RACE...by James A. Foster

jijosu55@yahoo.com

Source: PopularArticles.comTM / Science & Technology / http://www.PopularArticles.com/article41....

Report Post