Dual Roles: Councillors as Members of Parliament
The NSW Government has released a “Dual Roles: Councillors as Members of Parliament in NSW Discussion Paper”.It’s open for submissions with closing date of 31 January 2012,
email to: dlg@dlg.nsw.gov.au
The Question:
Should mayors and Councillors who are also Members of Parliament be eligible to stand for local government elections?
The Answer:
*when voters complain about narrowing our local roads to the local MP they get a reply from the Councillor’s Office. We have lost our democratic right of appeal to our local member as they are also Councillor.
*it’s a conflict of interested & not democratic to have local MP also on the local Council
*when they are MP & on Council voters are not sure who to complain to.
*The local MP’s role is a full time job. It’s not practical for MP’s to do two jobs.
*Being Mayor is a full time job. Not a part-time job *Because a person has two jobs on Council & MP; there are other people who could be better MP as they can give their full time to the tasks in NSW Parliament
*It reduces local advocacy because voters can’t complain to their local MP on council issues as they are also on Council
*It’s inefficient as one person can’t be in two places at the same time. If there is a meeting of Parliament and meeting of Council what takes priority?
*Members of Parliament on their level of salary should have one job.
*Being on Council & MP has a significant impact reducing representative democracy in the electorate. Voters have no one to complain to about Council.
*The workload of being MP & on Council is not comparable to that of a Minister because they are conflicting roles. Local Council issues are different from State issues. The voters are not been well served by persons being MP & Councillors.
* It's not acceptable for a politician to pledge a full-time commitment to one job, mayor, and to make the same commitment to being an MP.
*Most other states don’t allow this double dipping, nor should NSW


Comments
Peter Langsam posts
I agree that it is double dipping and a potential conflict of interest but I wonder if that is the O'Farrell Government's real motive or is it something else.
By submitting your comment you agree to our community agreement / terms of use.